Skip to content
Product Design / CRE Tech · 2025

InvestorPrism

Turning a multifamily deal board into a professional network where real estate investors find, vet and message each other

InvestorPrism — final design
Type
Capstone · real client
Client
Tony Tamales, founder of InvestorPrism
My work
My Network, connection cards, Profile, competitive analysis
Colin
Home Dashboard, Messaging
Stas
Splash page, FAQ
Tools
Figma, Google Sheets

InvestorPrism is a website where real estate sponsors advertise apartment and commercial property deals to investors. It could show deals, but it couldn't help people find each other or decide who to trust. For our capstone, Colin, Stas and I worked with founder Tony Tamales to turn it into a LinkedIn-style network for real estate investing, in time for him to show investors.

28User stories that defined what we built
10 → 5My Network tabs, cut to the roles that matter
3Designers, one shared design system
13New screens in the MVP prototype

Real estate deals run on trust. The product only had listings.

In a real estate syndication, one experienced sponsor (the general partner, or GP) finds and runs a property, and investors (limited partners, or LPs) put money in. Before anyone wires money, they ask one question: do I trust this person?

InvestorPrism let sponsors post deals and let investors browse them, but it stopped there. You couldn't find a partner, see who you had in common, or start a conversation. Tony wanted it to work more like LinkedIn: a place where those relationships form. He needed a clickable prototype of that vision to show potential funders.

Me: My Network, cards and Profile

How people find each other, what you see before you connect, and what proves a sponsor is worth trusting. I also led the competitive analysis.

Colin: Home Dashboard and Messaging

What you see when you log in, and how conversations with connections happen inside the app.

Stas: Splash page and FAQ

How a new visitor learns what InvestorPrism is and gets their questions answered before signing up.

A deal board, not a network.

We started from mockups by a previous designer. We reviewed them against the one thing Tony cared about: helping the right people connect. Drag the slider to compare the old Profiles page with the My Network page I designed to replace it.

Before
After
BeforeAfter
Before: one grid of identical cards with "Learn more" and "Save to short list." After: people sorted by their role in a deal, with their track record, mutual connections and a way to message them.
  • You couldn't find the right people. "Profiles" was one long grid with no way to narrow it to sponsors or investors in your market.
  • There were no relationships. Nothing let you connect, follow, or see who you had in common.
  • Profiles didn't prove anything. A sponsor's track record was buried in a paragraph of text.
  • There was no home and no way to talk. You logged in to a list of deals, and any conversation happened by phone or email, outside the product.
Screens we inherited
  • Home (Deals): live deals filtered by status and check size, with no people in sight

  • Sign up: a clean start, but nothing about who's already on the platform

Skills used — Heuristic evaluation · Content audit

Competitors had the deals. None of them had the community.

I compared the two platforms Tony's users already knew, looking at strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats.

Pallas

Friendly for new investors, with strong education and direct access to sponsors. But it's focused narrowly on syndications and has few social features.

Janover Engage

A large, trusted network with over $1B in confirmed investments. But it's limited to accredited investors, pricing is unclear, and there's little community beyond raising money.

Both platforms show deals and sponsors clearly, and both stop there. Neither lets people build a network, see shared connections, or talk inside the product. That gap became InvestorPrism's opportunity: keep the clear deal information investors expect, and add the social layer nobody else had.

Skills used — Competitive analysis · SWOT

From problems to user stories to screens.

We turned every problem into user stories: short sentences describing who needs something and why. Each story was scored with Tony for priority, value, risk and effort, then placed in a release. The highest-scoring stories became the screens we designed.

28User stories written
21Chosen for the MVP
4Planned for version 1.0
3Saved for version 2.0
  1. Problem: you can't find the right people.

    "As a GP, I want to search for Co-GPs, so that I can connect with them."

    The screen that answers it

    My Network (designed by me): people grouped by deal role and location, with search.

  2. Problem: there are no relationships.

    "As a user, I want to connect with other users, so that I can ask about offerings and build a network."

    The screen that answers it

    Connection cards (designed by me): Connect, View Profile and Message on every person, with mutual connections shown.

  3. Problem: you can't tell who to trust.

    "As a GP, I want to showcase my success, so that LPs and GPs feel confident investing with me."

    The screen that answers it

    Profile (redesigned by me): track record as numbers, live offerings, and trust badges.

  4. Problem: logging in shows nothing personal.

    "As a user, I want to log in and see my news feed, navigation and relevant information at a glance."

    The screen that answers it

    Home Dashboard (designed by Colin): your stats, a feed from your network, and people to meet.

  5. Problem: conversations leave the app.

    "As a user, I want to direct message other users, so that I can network with them."

    The screen that answers it

    Messaging (designed by Colin): an inbox sorted by connections and partnership requests.

  6. Problem: newcomers don't know what it is.

    "As a user, I want an FAQ section, so that I can get important questions answered quickly."

    The screen that answers it

    Splash page and FAQ (designed by Stas): what InvestorPrism does, for whom, and answers to common questions.

Lower-priority stories, like deal notifications, switching between Tony's other platforms, and post-close updates for investors, were real needs but didn't help Tony show his vision, so we moved them to later releases.

Skills used — User stories · Prioritization · Roadmapping

Ten tabs became five.

I designed My Network from scratch. It needed three things: filters with search, the new left-hand navigation, and cards that give a quick look at each person.

My first version: 10 tabs

All Connections, Near You, GP, LP, Co-GP, Syndicators, Favorites, Following, Followers. It covered everything, but several tabs were the same people under different names, so it was hard to know where to click.

Final: 5 tabs

All Connections, Near You, GPs, LPs, Co-GPs. Each tab matches a role in a real estate deal, so every one answers a question a sponsor or investor actually asks.

How should people be grouped in My Network?

One tab for every label a user might use (10 tabs)
One long list with a filter panel
A few tabs that match the roles in a deal

Why: Tony asked us to keep only the roles that matter in a deal, and it matched what we'd seen: "syndicator" and "GP" are the same people. Fewer, clearer tabs meant less guessing.

My Network, final · 5 · drag or scroll
All Connections: everyone you're connected to, with search
Near You: sponsors and investors active in your market
GPs: sponsors who lead deals
LPs: investors putting in capital
Co-GPs: partners who help carry a deal

Skills used — Information architecture · Wireframing · Client feedback

What should you know before you connect?

The card is the building block of the whole network, so I explored many versions before choosing one. Every version showed the same information: name, city, role badges, followers, deals, a short description and mutual connections. I shared the strongest with the team and Tony. After his feedback, I added assets under management (AUM) and deals led as both GP and LP, then restyled the card to match the rest of the product.

Role first

GP, Co-GP and LP badges sit right by the name, so you know how someone fits a deal at a glance.

Proof over bio

Deals, AUM and mutual connections get more space than a self-written description, because they're what builds trust.

Two clear actions

View Profile and Message are the only buttons. Share sits in the corner, so a page of cards doesn't become a page of buttons.

Final connection cards
The final card: role badges and Gold status, followers and AUM, deals led as GP and LP, mutual connections, and two clear actions.

Skills used — Visual design · Design exploration

A profile that answers "can I trust this sponsor?"

Drag the slider to compare the profile we started with and the one I designed.

Before
After
BeforeAfter
Before: a photo, a bio, and phone and email up front. After: a header card with a banner, role badges, mutual connections, and Connect and Message buttons, with the Recommended column alongside.

I redesigned the profile over three versions. The second added everything an investor might want and grew very long. The third cut it back to what investors actually use to decide. The final is about a third shorter than the longest version, and easier to scan.

Before

A photo, a short bio, contact details and a list of social links. Experience was three lines of small text, and there was no way to connect.

After

A header card with a banner, role badges, connections and mutuals. Experience shown as big numbers. Active offerings and current investments you can expand in place, and a Recommended column to find the next person to meet.

Final profile, full page
The full final profile: header card, About, experience as numbers, Active Offerings and Current Investments, and social links at the bottom.

How much contact information should a profile show?

Everything: phone, email, website and social links
Nothing outside the app
Website only, with social links unlocked by a paid badge

Why: Tony wanted conversations to happen inside InvestorPrism, and he wanted a reason for people to buy a badge. We removed phone and email, kept the website so sponsors still look credible, and blurred social links behind "Purchase Gold Badge to view."

Social links blurred behind a Gold Badge
Social links stay blurred until you buy a Gold Badge, which keeps conversations in the app and gives Tony something to charge for.

Skills used — Iteration · Business trade-offs

Colin's screens: a home about you, and a place to talk.

Colin designed the Home Dashboard and Messaging. The dashboard shows your own numbers at the top (active deals, investments, upcoming events), your feed in the middle, and your profile summary, recently viewed people and recommendations on the right. Messaging sorts conversations into All, My Connections, Connection Requests and Requests to Co-GP, so a sponsor looking for a partner can find those requests quickly.

Because my cards and profile appear inside his screens, we reviewed each other's work to keep badges, avatars and buttons consistent.

Designed by Colin
  • Home Dashboard: your stats, your feed, and people to meet

  • Messages: every conversation, with role badges on each thread

  • Requests to Co-GP: partnership requests, kept apart from everyday chat

Skills used — Collaboration · Design reviews

Stas's screens: explaining InvestorPrism to someone new.

Stas designed the splash page and the FAQ. The splash page tells each audience what's in it for them: sponsors can advertise their deals, investors can find opportunities, and GPs can find co-sponsors in their market. The FAQ answers the questions people ask before signing up, from raising capital to pricing and security.

InvestorPrism splash page
Splash page: one message for each audience, with a clear call to sign up.
InvestorPrism FAQ
FAQ: grouped questions, with the same left-hand navigation as the rest of the product.

Skills used — Collaboration · Content design

Three designers, one product.

We started in high fidelity, so the first thing we built together was a shared system: colors, type, badges, cards, buttons, and the top bar and left-hand navigation. That's what lets three people's screens feel like one product.

InvestorPrism color palette
Green #479E28 for actions, navy #012758 for the brand, and greys for text, borders and background.

One action color

Green always means "do something": Post a deal, View Profile, Send. Everything else stays neutral.

Badges mean the same thing everywhere

GP, Co-GP and LP each have their own color, on cards, profiles and messages alike.

Same frame on every screen

Every screen shares the top bar and left-hand navigation, so moving between them never feels like a different app.

Skills used — Design systems · Visual design

From a listings site to a network.

  • A prioritized list of 28 user stories, with a clear MVP and two later releases
  • My Network, organized by deal role and cut from ten tabs to five
  • A connection card built around trust signals
  • A profile rebuilt around track record and live offerings, with a badge model Tony can charge for
  • A home dashboard, messaging, splash page and FAQ from Colin and Stas
  • A clickable prototype and shared component library for Tony's funding conversations

The timeline didn't allow usability testing, and InvestorPrism had no users yet, so our feedback came from working sessions with Tony. That worked because he knew exactly what he needed to show. The next step would be testing My Network and the profile with real sponsors and investors, starting with whether the badges actually build trust.

Skills used — Client handoff

What I learned.

User stories keep a team honest

Writing every problem as a user story, and scoring it with the client, meant we never argued about taste. Each screen had a clear reason to exist, and a clear reason when something was cut.

Complete isn't the same as clear

My ten-tab network covered every case and helped no one. Grouping people by what they do in a deal was the turning point.

Working as a team of three

It was my first time splitting a product between designers. Building a shared system first is what let our screens come together as one prototype, and reviewing Colin's and Stas's work taught me as much as my own.